History | Log In     View a printable version of the current page.  
Issue Details (XML | Word | Printable)

Key: QA-24
Type: Oracle - Internals Oracle - Internals
Status: Closed Closed
Resolution: Answered
Priority: Major Major
Assignee: ubTools Support
Reporter: ubTools Support
Votes: 0
Watchers: 0
Operations

If you were logged in you would be able to see more operations.
Questions & Answers

ORA-07445 [000000010112A75C] during import.

Created: 15/Jul/07 05:35 PM   Updated: 16/Sep/07 04:26 PM
Return to search
Fix Version/s: None

Product Version: 8.1.7.2.0
Operating System: Solaris
Operating System Version: 5.8


 Description  « Hide

Error code:

ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [000000010112A75C] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [260] [] []

Current SQL statement for this session:

CREATE PROCEDURE TableParse_Proc wrapped
0
abcd
abcd
abcd
abcd
abcd
..

Oracle kernel function from which the problem is raised:

parfs4_freelist_sort()

Process state:

PROCESS STATE
-------------
...
   ----------------------------------------
   SO: 399071ce0, type: 3, owner: 39905dc18, pt: 0, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
   (session) trans: 399e4f3b8, creator: 39905dc18, flag: (10000041) USR/- BSY/-/-/-/-/-
             DID: 0001-0008-00000002, short-term DID: 0000-0000-00000000
             txn branch: 0
             oct: 24, prv: 0, user: 360/WINRLS
   O/S info: user: mtrxdev, term: pts/2, ospid: 8915, machine: vhdcap5g
             program: imp@vhdcap5g (TNS V1-V3)
   last wait for 'SQL*Net more data from client' blocking sess=0x0 seq=45627 wait_time=-2
               driver id=62657100, #bytes=2882, =0
     ----------------------------------------

Problem explanation:

As seen above, this problem was encountered in import while creating a wrapped package.

Bug:

There are several bugs about this problem with additional ORA-4030 error. The base bug is below:

  • Bug:2278310 IMPORT OF WRAPPED PL/SQL PROCEDURE FAILS WITH ORA-04030


 All   Comments   Change History      Sort Order: Ascending order - Click to sort in descending order
There are no comments yet on this issue.